Psychedelic Therapy & Ecopsychology: Integrating Systems Thinking for Planetary Health
Table of Contents
Introduction
Since the early 2000s, a rigorous resurgence of clinical research has catalyzed what is now widely called the "psychedelic renaissance." Peer-reviewed trials at Johns Hopkins, Imperial College London, NYU, and other leading institutions have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of psilocybin and related compounds for depression, addiction, end-of-life anxiety, and trauma. Regulatory frameworks are evolving. Public discourse has shifted. Psychedelic science has re-entered mainstream medicine and psychedelics are re-entering mainstream culture.
Scientific validation has been necessary. It has provided legitimacy, safety protocols, and empirical grounding to a field long marginalized. Yet, an exclusively biomedical lens remains wholly incomplete.
At Psygaia, we argue that the future of psychedelic therapy, psychedelic integration, and psychedelic practice requires moving beyond a strictly neurocentric model. Psychedelics do not only affect neural circuitsâthey alter perception, affect, and behavior. They reshape how we relate to self, community, and the living Earth. To understand their full impact, we must integrate clinical science with systems theory, ecopsychology, and crucially, Indigenous ecological knowledge.
The next phase of the psychedelic renaissance is not simply about molecules.
It is about worldview, about collective meaning-making.
Beyond the Brain: A Systems Approach to Psychedelics
Modern clinical trials have established gold-standard protocols for safety and efficacy: rigorous screening, medical oversight, structured preparation, non-directive facilitation, and integration support. Psygaia fully endorses these standards. Evidence-based care is non-negotiable.
However, research design necessarily isolates variables. Participants are treated as individual subjects within controlled environments. This approach is scientifically appropriate but philosophically and practically narrow.
A systems-theory perspective asks different questions: What happens when psychedelic experiences are understood not merely as internal psychological events, but as relational shifts within broader cultural and ecological systems?
From a Psygaian perspective, an individual is not an isolated brain in a skull. A person exists within nested systemsâfamily, community, ecosystem, biosphere. Psychedelic experiences frequently reveal this embeddedness directly, through feelings of interconnectedness, biophilia, and ecological belonging. These are not merely subjective impressions; they reflect actual biological and relational realities.
A truly evidence-informed model of psychedelic integration must therefore account for both neurobiology and relational ecology.
The Architecture of Psychedelic Practice
Across leading research institutions, psychedelic-assisted therapy follows a tripartite structure: Preparation, Dosing Session, and Integration. This framework is now the global clinical standard, and for good reasonâit provides psychological containment, informed consent, and therapeutic continuity.
Psygaia supports this architecture while expanding its interpretive frame.
Preparation: Cultivating Relational Ground
In clinical research, preparation clarifies intentions, builds trust, and educates participants about potential effects. These functions are essential.
From an ecopsychological perspective, preparation also involves situating the individual within a broader relational field. Intention is not merely a personal goal but a relational orientation. What is this experience in service of? Personal symptom reduction? Community healing? Ecological responsibility?
Research increasingly suggests that therapeutic outcomes correlate strongly with meaning-making and felt connectedness. Preparation therefore benefits from engaging questions of identity, worldview, and ecological relationshipânot only symptom profiles.
Set & Setting Reconsidered
Decades of psychedelic research confirm that "set" (mindset) and "setting" (environment) are decisive variables. Clinical trials optimize set through psychological orientation and therapeutic alliance. Setting is often modified hospital spaceâsoftened, made more comfortable, less sterile.
Ecopsychology extends this framework. Setting is not simply furniture and lighting. It is the broader ecological and cultural environment in which an experience unfolds. Human nervous systems evolved in relationship with forests, rivers, and cycles of light and dark, cold and warmth. The environmental context of psychedelic work influences outcomes not only psychologically but physiologically.
This does not romanticize nature. It acknowledges empirical reality: humans are biological organisms embedded within communities and ecosystems. An expanded set-and-setting framework recognizes land as context, not backdrop.
Innate Healing Intelligence & Ecological Regeneration
Non-directive facilitation is the clinical gold standard in psychedelic-assisted therapy. Institutions such as MAPS and Fluence train practitioners to avoid imposing interpretive frameworks onto participants' experiences. Instead, facilitators trust what is often called the "Inner Healer" or "Inner Healing Intelligence." At Psygaia, we prefer to call this the âInnate Healing Intelligence,â in recognition that this intelligence also exists all around us, not only within.
This concept aligns with ecological systems thinking. Just as a forest regenerates after disturbance when conditions allow, the human psyche demonstrates self-organizing tendencies toward coherence when safety is established. The facilitator does not engineer healing; they create conditions for it.
Ecopsychology suggests this regenerative principle is not uniquely human but systemic. Psychedelic experiences frequently mirror ecological processesâdissolution, reorganization, emergence. Understanding this parallel may help bridge psychological healing with ecological awareness.
Dosing: Standardization & Nuance
Clinical research typically employs standardized dosing ranges (ie. 25â40mg of synthetic psilocybin). Standardization protects study integrity and allows cross-trial comparison, critical for scientific progress.
However, outside strict research contexts, biological variability and psychological readiness complicate rigid dosing models. Metabolism, prior experience, trauma history, and expectation all influence outcomes. The broader field must grapple with a productive tension: how to preserve scientific rigor while acknowledging individual complexity.
Precision does not mean uniformity. It means informed decision-making grounded in data, safety, and context.
Integration: From Insight to Ecological Responsibility
Integration is often described as the process of translating altered-state insights into sustained behavioral change. Neuroscience suggests a post-psychedelic window of heightened neuroplasticityâa period in which cognitive and emotional patterns become more malleable.
But what is being integrated? And integration into what?
Individuals frequently report experiences of interconnectedness, unity, or ecological belonging. The MEQ-30 (Mystical Experience Questionnaire) consistently correlates such experiences with improved long-term outcomes.
Psygaia proposes that integration should include ecological integration: How does a shift in perceived interconnectedness translate into daily life? Into consumption patterns? Into community engagement? Into ecological awareness? Into pro-social and pro-environmental behaviour?
If psychedelic therapy increases connectedness but fails to engage relational and ecological responsibility, it risks becoming self-referentialâfocused solely on individual optimization.
The Anthropocene demands more.
Measuring Outcomes: Beyond Symptom Reduction
Clinical research relies on validated instrumentsâWHO-5, MEQ-30, ASC, depression inventories, and others. These tools are essential for scientific progress.
Yet symptom reduction alone may prove insufficient as a metric of success. Psychedelic experiences frequently affect worldview, ethical orientation, and sense of place within the biosphere. Future research should consider whether measures of ecological identity, pro-environmental behavior, and relational wellbeing belong within outcome frameworks.
If psychedelics catalyze reconnectionânot merely reliefâour evaluation models must evolve accordingly.
From Psychedelic Renaissance to Planetary Health
The first wave of the psychedelic renaissance focused on legitimacy and clinical validation. The second wave may need to focus on integration into broader cultural and ecological systems.
We face a planetary crisis characterized by ecological degradation, social fragmentation, and existential alienation. Psychedelics alone will not solve these crises. But research suggests they can shift perception in ways that soften rigid ego boundaries and increase relational awareness.
The question is no longer whether psychedelics work for depression. Evidence increasingly suggests they can. The deeper question is whether psychedelic science will remain confined to the clinicâor whether it will mature into a framework that acknowledges humans as ecological beings within a living planet.
A Psygaian Synthesis
Psygaia advocates for a synthesis that holds multiple commitments simultaneously:
Clinical rigor and harm reduction as non-negotiable foundations. Systems theory as an interpretive lens. Ecopsychology as a bridge between psyche and biosphere. Respect for Indigenous knowledge traditions. Planetary health as an ethical horizon.
Research studies are designed to test hypotheses. A planetary health framework asks what those findings mean for civilization.
From lab to land, the integration of psychedelic science and ecological systems thinking represents not a rejection of modern research but its maturation. If the psychedelic renaissance is to fulfill its transformative potential, it must move beyond molecules and metrics. It must ask how expanded states of consciousness can contribute not only to personal healing but to relational repairâbetween self, community, and Earth.
That is the work ahead.
References
Abram, D. (1996). The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a more-than-human World. Vintage Books.
Albert, M. (2019). Psychopharmacology in an age of planetary crisis [Conference paper]. Breaking Convention, United Kingdom.
Albrecht, G. (2016). Exiting the Anthropocene and Entering the Symbiocene. Minding Nature. https://www.humansandnature.org/filebin/pdf/minding_nature/may_2016/Albrecht_May2016.pdf
Argyri, E. K., Evans, J., Luke, D., Michael, P., Michelle, K., Rohani-Shukla, C., Suseelan, S., Prideaux, E., McAlpine, R., Murphy-Beiner, A., & Robinson, O. C. (2025). Navigating groundlessness: An interview study on dealing with ontological shock and existential distress following psychedelic experiences. PLOS One, 20(5), e0322501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322501
Banerjee, S. B., & ArjaliĂšs, D.-L. (2021). Celebrating the End of Enlightenment: Organization Theory in the Age of the Anthropocene and Gaia (and why neither is the solution to our ecological crisis). Organization Theory, 2(4), 263178772110367. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211036714
Beery, T., Stahl Olafsson, A., Gentin, S., Maurer, M., StĂ„lhammar, S., Albert, C., Bieling, C., Buijs, A., Fagerholm, N., GarciaâMartin, M., Plieninger, T., & M. Raymond, C. (2023). Disconnection from nature: Expanding Our Understanding of Human-nature Relations. People and Nature, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10451
Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred ecology. Routledge.
Bourzat, F., & Hunter, K. (2019). Consciousness Medicine: indigenous wisdom, psychedelic therapy, and the path of ... transformation. North Atlantic Books.
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. (2020). Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26669
Capra, F. (1996). The web of life : a new scientific understanding of living systems. Anchor Books.
Capra, F., & Pier Luigi Luisi. (2014). The Systems View of Life. Cambridge University Press.
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Erritzoe, D., Haijen, E., Kaelen, M., & Watts, R. (2017). Psychedelics and connectedness. Psychopharmacology, 235(2), 547-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4701-y
Carhart-Harris, R. L., & Friston, K. J. (2019). REBUS and the Anarchic Brain: Toward a Unified Model of the Brain Action of Psychedelics. Pharmacological Reviews, 71(3), 316-344. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.118.017160
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., GarcĂa, A., Pringle, R. M., & Palmer, T. M. (2015). Accelerated Modern Human-induced Species losses: Entering the Sixth Mass Extinction. Science Advances, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253
Celidwen, Y., Redvers, N., Githaiga, C., CalambĂĄs, J., Añaños, K., Chindoy, M. E., Vitale, R., Rojas, J. N., MondragĂłn, D., RosalĂo, Y. V., & SacbajĂĄ, A. (2023). Ethical principles of traditional Indigenous medicine to guide western psychedelic research and practice. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas, 18(1), 100410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100410
Devenot, N., Conner, T., & Doyle, R. (2022). Dark Side of the Shroom: Erasing Indigenous and Counterculture Wisdoms with Psychedelic Capitalism, and the Open Source Alternative. Anthropology of Consciousness, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/anoc.12154
Dupuis, D. (2021). Psychedelics as Tools for Belief Transmission. Set, Setting, Suggestibility, and Persuasion in the Ritual Use of Hallucinogens. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730031
Fisher, A. (2013). Radical ecopsychology : psychology in the service of life. State University Of New York Press.
Forstmann, M., & Sagioglou, C. (2017). Lifetime experience with (classic) psychedelics predicts pro-environmental behavior through an increase in nature relatedness. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 31(8), 975-988. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881117714049
Forstmann, M., & Sagioglou, C. (2025). Psychedelics and connectedness to natural and social worlds: An examination of the evidence and a proposed conceptual framework. Current Opinion in Psychology, 62, 101992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.101992
